Artificial intelligence

Transformer definition

Publiée le September 24, 2025

Introduction: what is a Transformer in artificial intelligence?

Transformer is the architecture that has shaken up artificial intelligence since 2017. Conceived by Google researchers in the seminal article “Attention is All You Need”, it paved the way for large language models (LLMs) like GPT, BERT, LLaMA or Gemini.

Why such an impact? Because Transformer has replaced conventional sequential approaches (RNN, LSTM) with anattention mechanism capable of processing words in parallel and understanding their relationships in the overall context of a text. The result: faster, more accurate and infinitely more powerful models for translating, generating, summarizing or analyzing natural language.

Today, the Transformer is no longer just an academic innovation: it’s the bedrock of modern AI, used in machine translation, virtual assistants, document analysis, code generation and even computer vision.

👉 In this article, we’ll clearly define what a Transformer is, understand how it works, its benefits and limitations, and explore its concrete applications in sectors such as banking, insurance, healthcare and customer relations.

1. Background, motivation and origins

Before the Transformer architecture, the dominant architectures for processing sequential data (such as sentences) were RNNs (recurrent neural networks), LSTMs (Long Short-Term Memory) or GRUs, sometimes combined with attention mechanisms. These architectures had several limitations:

  • they processed sequences iteratively (word by word), making parallelization difficult,

  • long-distance dependencies could fade (vanishing gradient problem) or be poorly modeled,

  • convolution-based architectures (as in some variants) had difficulty effectively capturing global relationships in the sequence.

The seminal article “Attention Is All You Need” (Vaswani et al., 2017) proposes an architecture based entirely on attention, without recourse to recurrent or convolutional mechanisms. DeanHub | Code Is Life+3arXiv+3Wikipedia+3
The authors show that this model is not only easier to parallelize, but also achieves better performance on machine translation tasks. arXiv

Since its publication, the Transformer architecture has become the cornerstone of many modern language processing models: BERT, GPT, T5, etc. Wikipedia+3Wikipedia+3neuron.ai+3


2. Global overview: encoder / decoder

The basic architecture of the Transformer follows an encoder-decoder scheme, as in many classic seq2seq (sequence-to-sequence) models. neuron.ai+3arXiv+3Jay Alammar+3

2.1 Encoder

  • The encoder takes a sequence as input (for example, a sentence in the source language).

  • It consists of a stack of NN identical layers (often N=6N = 6 in the “base” version of the original article). arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

  • Each encoder layer consists of two main sub-blocks:

    1. Self-Attention (multi-head)

    2. Positional feed-forward (feed-forward applied to each position)

  • Each sub-block is surrounded by a residual connection + layer normalization. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

At the encoder’s output, contextualized vector representations are obtained for each of the input tokens.

2.2 Decoder

  • The decoder generates the output (e.g. a translated sentence) autoregressively (word by word).

  • It also includes a stack of NN identical layers. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

  • Each decoder layer contains three sub-blocks:

    1. Masked self-attention: so that the position ii cannot “watch” future positions > ii.

    2. Encoder-decoder cross-attention: each decoder position can be attached to encoder positions.

    3. Positional feed-forward

  • Here too, each sub-block is equipped with residual connections + layer normalization. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

Finally, after the last decoder layer, we apply a linear + softmax layer to obtain the probability distribution on the vocabulary for the next token. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

This architecture is represented visually in numerous tutorials, for example on The Illustrated Transformer website. Jay Alammar


3. Key components and their mathematical operation

To fully understand the Transformer, it’s essential to look at its fundamental mechanisms:attention (and self-attention),multi-headed attention,positional encoding, feed-forward networks, and residual connections + normalization.

3.1 Attention (scaled dot-product) and self-attention

The heart of the Transformer is the attention mechanism. The general idea is that, for each position (token) in a sequence, we want to calculate a weighting (attention) on the other positions to aggregate useful information.

The formula for scaled dot-product attention is :

Attention(Q,K,V)=softmax(QK⊤dk)V\text{Attention}(Q, K, V) = \text{softmax}\left(\frac{Q K^\top}{\sqrt{d_k}}\right) V

where

The term 1dk\frac{1}{\sqrt{d_k}} is a scaling factor designed to prevent scalar products from becoming too large, which would make the softmax too “sharp” (not very stable). arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

Inself-attention, the Q,K,VQ, K, V are all derived from the same input (or output) sequence, allowing each position to “pay attention” to other positions in the same sequence. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

In this way, each position receives an enriched representation of its global context.

3.2 Multi-Head Attention

Rather than a single attention head, the Transformer uses several parallel heads. The idea: each head can learn a different relationship between tokens (e.g. syntactic, semantic, proximity, etc.). arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

The process is as follows:

  1. For each head iiwe project Q,K,VQ, K, V via head-specific linear matrices : Qi=QWiQQ_i = Q W^{Q}_i, Ki=KWiKK_i = K W^{K}_i, Vi=VWiVV_i = V W^{V}_i.

  2. We calculate the attention on each head: Attention(Qi,Ki,Vi)\text{Attention}(Q_i, K_i, V_i).

  3. We concatenate the outputs of all heads, then apply a final linear projection. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

This approach increases the expressiveness of the model, capturing various aspects of the relationship between positions. DEV Community+2Towards AI+2

3.3 Positional encoding

Because the Transformer doesn’t process the sequence in an ordered way (no recursive loop), we need to add positional information to the token embeddings so that the model knows “where” each token is located. xmarva.github.io+3arXiv+3neuron.ai+3

The original article proposes sinusoidal encoding:

PE(pos,2i)=sin(pos100002i/dmodel)PE(pos,2i+1)=cos(pos100002i/dmodel)\begin{aligned} PE_{(pos, 2i)} &= \sin\left(\frac{pos}{10000^{2i / d_{\text{model}}}}\right) \\ PE_{(pos, 2i+1)} &= \cos\left(\frac{pos}{10000^{2i / d_{\text{model}}}}\right) \end{aligned}

where pospos is the position in the sequence, ii is the index in the encoding vector, and dmodeld_{\text{model}} is the dimension of the model. DeanHub | Code Is Life+3arXiv+3xmarva.github.io+3

These position vectors are added (summed) to the word embeddings before entering the first encoder/decoder block. xmarva.github.io+3arXiv+3neuron.ai+3

An important reason for using sin/cos functions is to allow the model to generalize to sequence lengths greater than those encountered during training, as sinusoidal patterns are extrapolable. arXiv+1

Other positional encoding variants (learnable, rotatable, etc.) have been proposed in later work, but the principle remains the same. DeepWiki+1

3.4 Positional feed-forward network

After each attention block (or cross-attention), each position passes through a small individual feed-forward network, applied independently to each position:

FFN(x)=max(0,xW1+b1) W2+b2\text{FFN}(x) = \max(0, x W_1 + b_1)\, W_2 + b_2

This is a small, dense layer (often two linear layers with non-linear activation, often ReLU) applied at each position. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

This operation adds local (per position) non-linear capacity to the representations.

3.5 Residual + layer norm connections

To facilitate deep network training, each sub-block (attention, feed-forward) uses a residual connection: the input of the sub-block is added to its output. Then layer normalization is applied. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

Schematically :

LayerNorm(x+SousBloc(x))\text{LayerNorm}(x + \text{SousBloc}(x))

This technique stabilizes training, improves gradient propagation, and avoids performance degradation when the model becomes deep.


4. Training and inference processes

4.1 Training

  • The model is trained on input sequence/target sequence pairs (e.g. source and target sentences in a translation task).

  • We apply the masking technique in the decoder to prevent the model from “seeing” the future tokens (we mask the positions > ii when generating the token ii). arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

  • Techniques such as learning rate warm-up, dropout, label smoothing, etc. are used to regularize and stabilize training. arXiv+2neuron.ai+2

  • The loss function is generally the cross-entropy between the predicted distribution (softmax) and the true distribution (target token).

In the original article, one of the basic models was trained in 3.5 days on 8 GPUs. arXiv

4.2 Inference / generation

  • In generation mode, the model decodes autoregressively: one token is generated at a time, using previously generated tokens as partial input.

  • Masking is applied to prevent “looking ahead”.

  • Various strategies can be used to select the next token: greedy, beam search, sampling, top-k, top-p (nucleus sampling), etc.


5. Strengths, limits and trends

5.1 Strengths and benefits

  1. Parallelization: as the Transformer has no strict sequential dependencies, the entire sequence can be processed in parallel – greatly speeding up training. Wikipedia+3arXiv+3neuron.ai+3

  2. Long-range modeling: each position can directly “see” the whole sequence via attention, making it easier to capture distant dependencies. neuron.ai+2DeanHub | Code Is Life+2

  3. Flexibility: the architecture is generic enough to be adapted to a variety of tasks (translation, text generation, comprehension, etc.).

  4. Scalability: modern versions can scale up to very large models (LLMs) with billions of parameters.

  5. Peak performance: many Transformer-based models dominate today’s NLP benchmarks.

5.2 Limits / challenges

  • The cost in memory and calculation can become very high for long sequences (quadratic complexity in the length of the sequence, due to calculations QK⊤QK^\top).

  • Some “pure attention” versions may suffer from rank degeneracy (their outputs may converge to low-rank matrices) if bypass mechanisms (residuals, MLPs) are not added. An article entitled “Attention is Not All You Need” explores this phenomenon. arXiv

  • The need for massive data and computing power is often very high to achieve peak performance.

  • Masking or full global attention is not always ideal for very long sequences: variants (restricted, hierarchical, compressed attention) have been proposed.

5.3 Evolutions and variants

Since the original Transformer, many extensions and variants have emerged:

  • Transformer-XL, Reformer, Longformer, BigBird: models adapted to manage very long sequences with restricted or efficient attentions.

  • Alternative positional encodings (learnable, rotary, relative) for enhanced flexibility.

  • Encoder-only models (like BERT) or decoder-only models (like GPT): the architecture can be simplified to suit the task in hand. DeanHub | Code Is Life+2neuron.ai+2

  • Multimodal transformers: applied not only to text, but also to images, audio, graphs, etc.


6. Example of data flow (with a small example)

To illustrate, here is a simplified flow for a translation task:

  1. We take a source sentence: “The cat is sleeping.”

  2. On tokenize (“Le”, “chat”, “dort”, “.”) → embeddings + positional encoding → encoder input.

  3. The encoder processes this sequence via its attention + feed-forward layers: enriched representations are obtained for each token.

  4. The decoder starts with a starting token <s> and generates a new token at each step.

    • It performs masked self-attention on tokens already generated.

    • It cross-checks the encoder output.

    • It is a feed-forward process.

    • Produces a distribution on vocabulary → we choose the following token (e.g. “The”).

    • Repeat until you reach the end token <\!s>.

Each output position is influenced both by previous target positions (via masked self-attention) and by input positions (via cross-attention).

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

Conclusion

The Transformer is not just a technical brick: it’s the foundation of modern AI. By replacing sequential processing withattention and parallel computing, it has made possible the major advances in LLM (comprehension, generation, translation, assisted reasoning) and their deployment on an enterprise scale.
Its strengths – scalability, performance over a long context, multi-modality adaptability – make it the reference architecture for critical use cases: document analysis, business assistants, fraud detection, automation.

There remains one imperative: to govern these models (data quality, RAG for accuracy, explainability, human control, security). Organizations that master this triptych of model + data + governance are already transforming their operations and customer experience.

Remember: understanding Transformer means having a common language for evaluating, integrating and industrializing AI. What’s the next step? Map your use cases, define the sources of truth (RAG) and launch a measurable pilot with clear quality and risk metrics. To find out more :

Autres articles

Voir tout
Contact
Écrivez-nous
Contact
Contact
Contact
Contact
Contact
Contact